![]() ![]() We find that Buridan’s logical hylomorphism reduplicates the peculiarities of his physical hylomorphism. ![]() I then place Buridan’s logic specifically, and its development more broadly, against the backdrop of these developments in metaphysics over the same period. I then introduce Buridan’s metaphysical views: focusing on the question of whether several substantial forms may be present in the same subject drawing from Buridan’s questions on Aristotle’s Physics and De Anima and contrasting the views found there with the unicity theory of Aquinas. ![]() After setting forth the requisite definitions, I introduce Buridan’s distinction between formal and material consequence as presented in his Treatise on Consequences: first giving the generic structure of the distinction, then placing the distinction in its historical development. Buridan is not the first Latin author to explicate a distinction between formal and material consequence but it is Buridan’s version of the distinction that becomes widely adopted throughout continental Europe in the later middle ages, ultimately laying the groundwork for today’s model-theoretic accounts of formal consequence. Both the development of systematic treatises on consequence and the application of hylomorphic language to consequences first take place in the later middle ages, culminating in the work of the Parisian arts master John Buridan. The accompanying growth of hylomorphism, and particularly mereological hylomorphism, in thinking about consequence. The division of consequences into natural and accidental, and the later replacement of this division by that into formal and material varieties. The development of the concept of consequence, first as a replacement for the framework of Aristotle’s Topics, then as a broader category under which syllogistic, too, was subsumed. Holds the necessary knowledge of classical languages, a modern language in addition to English and history of philosophy to conduct an advanced philosophical study particularly in history of philosophy.This paper contributes to an explanation of how a sea change in logic from the later 13th to the early 14th century relates to certain metaphysical debates during the same period. Produces work of the quality of a contribution in national and international peer-reviewed journals in philosophy. Uses his/her philosophical knowledge to establish interactions at national and international level. Ĭonducts an advanced study in history of philosophy which requires expertise, independently by using original texts.Īpplies philosophical knowledge to questions concerning contemporary, socio-cultural and political problematics.Ĭonsiders universal values and concepts of philosophy as a basis for philosophical studies in Turkey and is able to develop an approach to study and analyse issues that might arise when conducting discussions concerning history of philosophy in the Turkish language.Īcquires the skill and background for making contributions to the field of history of philosophy, in national and international terms. Proves to be a philosopher with principles, who communicates effectively, is specifically successful in written and oral presentation, has proper capacities for teamwork and interdisciplinary studies, takes the initiative, has developed a sense of responsibility, and contributes original ideas to the field of philosophy.Īpplies life-long learning attitude to various ways of acquiring knowledge in order to maintain a professional and personal development.ĭevelops a consciousness of professional and social ethics.Īcquires the necessary skill of choosing and developing actual means and using computing technologies effectively for a philosophical study. Improves a versatile critical and analytical approach, problem-solving, interpretative and argumentative skills in relation to advanced philosophical investigations. Acquires fundamental conceptual and methodological knowledge to use productively and creatively in academic studies. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |